The question of human origins remains as the great enigma of evolutionary biology. The findings of current Darwinism have obscured the issue with a reductionist dogmatism that has resulted in a truncated image of man and his history. The greatest obstacle to advance is the illusion that the problem has been solved. Biology has shown us the evolutionary emergence of man in deep time. But the onset of Darwinism produced its classic debate that has orphaned the meaning of evolution with the claims for Darwin's theory of natural selection. And yet this hypothesis, due to its reductionist character, has simply compounded the puzzle of man. All questions of consciousness, morality, and human freedom are dumbed down to a physicalism that is inadequate to the task of explanation. If we examine Darwinism in practice we notice the failure to properly document the incidents taken by assumption to fall under the sway of natural selection. The limits of observation have been breached to produce an evolutionary myth. 

There is an ironic resolution to the problem of observation, the study of world history.  The question of the emergence of man is bound up in the question of civilization itself. And the facts of world history constitute a falsification of Darwinism, showing us processes which won't fit into the dogmatic framework created by Darwinian biology. We discover that until we can examine evolution at close range we are likely to be misled by the microevolutionary constant of genetic evolution in the same. World history shows us something very simple, and at the same time very complex: a process of non-random evolution. This process shows its hand in what we can call the 'eonic effect', a non-random pattern that simply won't reduce to the assumption of randomness. We are driven to infer or detect some mysterious macro aspect to world history itself. There is nothing complex about the eonic effect:.