3. A FREQUENCY
HYPOTHESIS

  

 

3.3.2 The Frontier Effect


Table of Contents for
 
World History 
And The Eonic Effect

Civilization, Darwinism, and Theories of Evolution
3rd. Edition
The Book
By  John Landon

Home

 

 

 
 

 3. A FREQUENCY HYPOTHESIS  
     3.1 AN EONIC SEQUENCE, AND A FREQUENCY DEDUCTION  
        3.1.1 A Short History Of The World  
     3.2 MODERN TO POSTMODERN  
        3.2.1 Genesis Of The (Early) Modern  
        3.2.2 A Middle Age  
        3.2.3 Decline And Fall: The Idea Of Progress  
     3.3 THE AXIAL AGE  
        3.3.1 Synchronous Parallelism: A Minimum Principle?   
        3.3.2 The Frontier Effect  
        3.3.3 Again, A Middle Age: Detecting Sumer…  
     3.4 THE BIRTH OF CIVILIZATION  
        3.4.1 Invisible Transitions? The Neolithic  
     3.5 THE EONIC EFFECT: PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM  
ENDNOTES  
     3.6 TRANSITION AND DIVIDE: A NEW MODEL OF THE MODERN  
        3.6.1 Freedom Evolves? The Discrete Freedom Sequence  
     3.7 SPENGLER, TOYNBEE, AND CYCLICAL THEORIES  
        3.7.1 Cycle, Counter-cycle: Floating Fourth Turning points


 3.3.2 The Frontier Effect
      

There is one more crucial property, the ‘acorn or frontier effect’. Note that something global is occurring starting in a series of local areas. But the sequence restarts in a new place each time, just at the frontier of its predecessor. The world of Archaic Greece  is a frontier relative to the center of gravity of civilization. The world of Canaan, spawning ‘Israel’, does not look like a frontier now, but in the era of the mythical Abraham it certainly was, and we even have a ‘pioneer’ story about his leaving the city of Ur in a prime diffusion source, the world of prior Sumer. A sort of double acorn effect, in fact, results from the equal influence of the Egyptian civilization nearby. Greece and Rome in the Axial period were definitely still frontier areas, relative to the by then ancient world of Egypt and Mesopotamia. Each of our transitions creates a hotspot, then expands to create a new civilization, better, oikoumene. Cultural acorns sprout in this field, and then at the next cycle one of them becomes a new transition. Note how our sequence is generating ‘evolution in the large’ via local hotspots, ‘short term evolution in the small’. We must study the diffusion fields of our turning points.

This property makes complete sense. If we restart too far away, the sequence can’t continue. But if we are too close, the momentum of the earlier stage will overwhelm advance or make novelty abortive. The strangest thing about this ‘Israel’ or ‘Israel/Judah’ is the way it can barely maintain its integrity as a state, yet manages to produce a second great tradition and literature, and this in synchronous emergence with the Greek. It succeeds by failure, remarkably, as the empires around it pass away. We are suspicious of an isomorphic structure here. This play on the state is characteristic of TP2, and we see all the stages of a state turning into a religion. The synchronous intervals match across the board, one to the other, from about –900 to the period just before the Exile, for a seminal period, with the period of great advance well completed by –400. Note that the by the second date the Old Testament is essentially a fait accompli. If we examine India and China we see once again analogous intervals in which creative advance occurs. Note that by about –400 a second world religion has come into existence in India.

 
 
 


 

  Top

Last modified: 01/24/2009