It is hard, in fact, impossible, to think of any other explanation than
that of the eonic effect, for what is bequeathed to us by the redactors
of the Old Testament, who, incidentally, lived after the events they
purported to describe. It is the eonic ‘smoking gun’, for behind its
history, however we reconstruct historical incidents from its account,
lies an implicit straddling of the period –900 to –600, with a
particular intensity in the period between –750 and afterward, an eonic
Bull’s eye, and indirect evidence that stands on its own
irregardless of the complete
facts.
The study of
Israel
from
the eonic perspective is in the final analysis the most effective for it
can help in seeing that the impulse to find transcendental explanations
is automatically suggested by the intangibility of the eonic sequence.
Minimum Eonic Periodization of ‘Histories of
Israel’:
1. stream approach
2. transitional period: eonic sequence
intersection
3. divide period
4. realization period.
That’s it, our eonic history of Israel. And it resolves all the
paradoxes of the
Israel
phenomenon. Reflect on the overall dynamic context. The only safe data,
as the Greek example might have forewarned us, is that of the prophetic
period, precisely at the climax of phase, and the period of the Exile
and the post-Exilic history. David and Solomon are almost like Achilles,
and Agamemnon, probably existed... The eonic matrix shows us the master
key, satisfied by all accounts. The Old Testament redactors in the
period from after the Exile unconsciously followed a procedure based on
these steps, for the same reason the modern historian is confused by the continuity-discontinuity paradox of the
modern, its medieval antecedent, and the sudden clustering near a
divide.
Thus it is important to see that the redactors were
at step 4, overwhelmed by the period at step 3, and attempting to
interpret, create, and include the remnant documents and memories of
steps 2, and the mythical or semi-historical step 1.
1. First we have the ‘primordial’ semi-historical
Abraham/Moses stage, corresponding to the mid-eonic phase of the
Canaanite cultures in the shadow of the Middle Eastern empires springing
from Babylon
and Egypt, the world
of the Ugarit.
2. This period
of the stream leads into the just-before period of Solomon, the history
and kingdom of a people in a not especially extraordinary Mediterranean
kingdom and empire, flourishing and then going into what many describe
as a start of political decline. The kingdom is evidently not the
transitional phenomenon. By –750 the age of the prophets is the one clear outer symptom of the transition given to
us, so parallel with the Upanishadic Age. It is this phase of the
prophets that tokens the
period of transition as such, just as the Greek philosophers token the
Greek transition.
3. We see the climax of the prophetic movement just
as the divide point is reached. It is indeed extraordinary to see the
emergence of monotheism and its sudden packaging in the period after
–600. As the system crosses the divide we see the Persian phenomenon and its
state ‘Zoroastrianism
’, blending in, and then the great
expansion of the Jewish network into the Middle East and Mediterranean worlds.
The ship has set sail, and we are in the emerging
world of Judaism. Shot out of a cannon, the Israelites become Jews and
burrow into the Roman Empire as a parallel counterpoint to the ‘great
Athens’ passing into Rome. Like a ‘throw and catch’ in a computer
program it is this strain in the great classical phase that will unveil
from its latency the ‘failsafe’ response to the great passage from
transitional ‘eonic determination’ to ‘free action’. As our system
passes from Solon to Pericles, to
Alexander, to the Caesars, a ‘recovery’ vehicle emerges in halting steps
from the Judaic branch as the rising oikoumene inherits of the benefits
of parallelism.
It is significant, as a lost strain of this
transition, that the tale of the Exodus myth expresses one of the first
appearances in world history of the type of ‘revolution
ary ideology’, however seminal in form. The Post-Exilic world was many
things, and one aspect of it was a conservative continuation of the type
of ‘temple culture’ already very ancient in the Middle East. The ‘revolution’ is still
the ‘revolution of the ages’ with its transparent symbolism of ‘new age’
and ‘Egyptian repression’.